|
Case Law
|
Note:
For information on
references
cited
in the Federal
Cases below, click here. |
 Download the
free
Adobe
Reader for "pdf" files |
Glossary of Terms
| Case Law Citations
(cites) - An excellent reference book for
persons without any legal background is the one titled
"Legal Research" seen on the right..
It will teach you the composition of a case cite that are
frequently used in family law cases. It will demystify what
you are reading and help you to understand the basis upon
which courts rely to make rulings.
You will learn how to do your own research and understand
what you are doing and why. This is an invaluable guide for
the person who is self-represented in court. It is written
in easy to understand layman's language. |
|
Abstentions:
Alimony:
Alimony
and Attorney's Fees
-
Barna v.
Barna, 850 So.2d 603 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003 -
Petition
for a Writ of Certiorari for fee shifting. Frivolous Motions.
-
Finol v.
Finol, 869 So.2d 866 (2004): No client-attorney
privilege exists in requests for discovery relating to the fees paid
to an attorney. Bank accounts, credit card accounts, are all subject
to a subpoena and your attorney will fork over that information to
your former wife's attorney. Don't forget to get a receipt.
-
Messana
v. Seaside Community Development Co.
1st DCA Case #1D04-3270 (Aug. 5, 2005)
- awarding
attorney’s fees is deficient if it does not set forth specific
findings regarding the attorney’s hourly rate, the number of hours
reasonably expended, and the appropriateness of reduction or
enhancement factors.
Alimony and
Extradition:
Alimony
and Retirement:
Imputed Income:
Contempt:
Peonage:
Right to Privacy
-
Littlejohn v. Rose,
768 F. 2d 765, *6th Cir. (1985) - The case states that divorce is within the
umbrella of the Right of Privacy. That means any statute written in that zone is
privacy protected and presumptively unconstitutional. The only question
remaining is: "Is there a compelling state interest for the alimony statute and
is it minimally applied?"
-
Loving v. Virginia -
388 U.S. 1,
12, 87 S.Ct. 1817 (1967):
Miscegenation law (marriage between
races) held violative of Equal Protection: "Marriage is one of
the ‘basic civil rights of man,' fundamental to our very
existence and survival."
-
Planned Parenthood v. Casey
- (505 US
833) in 1992.
"Our law affords
constitutional protection to personal decisions relating to
marriage."
-
Principles of Equal Protection -
Site with many cites on Right
to Privacy.
-
Richardson v.
Richardson
734 So. 2d 1063 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999)
-
Has
to do with the grandparent visitation parts violating the right
of privacy of parents to decide who their kids can visit
with...not the grandparents rights
-
Zablocki v.
Redhail
(434 US 374) in 1978
Separation of Powers
-
Bush v. Schiavo,
885 So. 2d 321, (Fla. 2004) - A law permitting the
governor to stay the court-ordered removal of a feeding tube
enacted after the order had been rendered was an
unconstitutional invasion of the separation of powers.
Federal Case Law
-
Section
1983 Litigation: The fundamental issues that arise
in litigation under
42 U.S.C. § 1983, the statute for redressing
constitutional and federal statutory violations, and the
case law interpreting those issues.
Date last updated:
05/08/2008
|